Worst Weasel Boogle: Those Who Travel in Groups of 5 to 4

USSC: The Fanciest Boogle in Town

The 5-4 Boogle, or Pack, or Gang

Change the Name to "For Men Only Club"

Hobby-Lobby Male Employee at Home

It is a well-known fact that I am upset, like millions like me, about the awful Hobby-Lobby (5-4) decision just handed down that hampers a woman's choice about her own health care and whether she wants to have a baby, or another baby, or more, or not.

But for men, well... that's a different story it seems as seen in this short clip from Huffington Post, seen here.

Hobby-Lobby and apparently the 5-4 old gents club it seems have no problems with a man stopping a pregnancy with his Hobby-Lobby-sponsored "snip-snip" health care plan coverage. Or if the man or men happen to have a problem say "getting it up or keeping it up" long enough to say, "complete the act" and try to get their wife or mate pregnant, well heck, that's covered by Hobby-Lobby's plan, too.

So, let me see if I have this correct: Religious beliefs that we saw in full display in this case, mean in essence that a woman working for Hobby-Lobby can't decide for herself not have a baby, or another one, or take preventive steps to prevent a pregnancy on Hobby-Lobby's dime (that is their health care plan).

But man at Hobby-Lobby who wants to stop a pregnancy (with his "snip/snip" procedure) or that certainly prevents one, can get it done by having his wings clipped as it were on Hobby-Lobby's dime. 

Worse, I think, is if the man or men need help in getting aroused to impregnate his wife or mate on Hobby-Lobby's dime (in their health care plan appendix, I guess), then that is fine and dandy.

Well, alrighty then. So, where are all these provisions in the Bible. Or, are they in the weekly scriptures or in Sunday school class? 

Hey, I'm just asking. For those who say the high court didn't this case wrong, I would remind them about Dred Scott and Plessy and badly the high court got them wrong. Oops.