Wednesday, March 2, 2016

How to Spot a Political Weasel: Look for Blonde Wavy Hair Plugs Resembling Wings

Wavy Wing Hair: Dead Giveaway

Big Money Behind the Scenes Against Trump


First of all, watch this John Oliver segment about Trump on HBO.
Then you will see why nearly the entire GOP so-called “big donor establishment” is having kittens about how to stop Donald J. Trump. This 20-minute segment may be the best in HBO political history and John Oliver delivers big time. It surely is a keeper as they say. Enjoy.


Now, this excellent rundown from The Hill – my editing to fit the blog – noting highlights below:
Trump says: “We’re going to go to Florida, we’re going to spend so much time in Florida. I know that a lot of groups, a lot of the special interests and a lot of the lobbyists and the people that want to have their little senator do exactly as they want. ... But he’s not going anywhere anyway.”
Interviews with more than half a dozen sources involved in the various anti-Trump efforts reveal that anti-Trump strategies are developing at a frantic pace.  
A number of donors approached by the anti-Trump forces, however, have described the efforts as too little, too late after Trump’s domination of the early-voting states and near sweep of Super Tuesday contests, with one GOP mega-donor saying: “The game’s changed; it’s too big now,” (that donor has been approached by NYC hedge fund billionaire Paul Singer, who is a Rubio supporter, to join the anti-Trump effort. Then the donor concluded: “You can’t raise enough money to make a difference in these big media markets, especially Florida. That’s an expensive-ass media market.”
Note: About 50 Republican donors convened on a conference call Tuesday afternoon to hear anti-Trump pitches from GOP mega-donors Todd Ricketts, Meg Whitman, and Singer, according to two sources who participated in the call. The New York Times was the first to report the story. 
One major donor said: “I’m not going to send any money. I mean, I applaud what they’re doing … but it might be too late.” Another big Republican donor who has been personally approached by both Singer and Ricketts to join their anti-Trump efforts said that he wasn’t convinced by their arguments, although he respects what both are trying to do.  He added that Ricketts was trying to persuade him that Our Principles PAC early spending in Iowa did significant damage to Trump, who lost the caucuses there to Ted Cruz. But the donor described Ricketts’s argument as “confirmation bias” and then the donor told The Hill: “At this point it’s bad money after bad. I think it is flat-out crazy” (this donor supports Cruz). 
A source close to Our Principles PAC confirmed that Ricketts and the group had been arguing that the anti-Trump advertising in Iowa worked and could be equally effective in future states, said: “Iowa is one of the few places that Trump has come under a sustained advertising and messaging campaign. We educated people about his record, and it’s not surprising that it’s one of the states that Donald Trump has not won. And this particular fact is one that Todd Ricketts has shared with people and the PAC has shared with potential supporters. It’s an important fact,” that source concluded. 
The Ricketts family has shown it is willing to spend, adding to its initial $3 million investment in Our Principles PAC despite receiving a threat from Trump (two sources told The Hill).
Another question doing the gossip rounds in Republican donor circles is what will be done with the more than $15 million still sitting in the pro-Bush super-PAC Right to Rise.  Two of Right to Rise biggest donors told The Hill that they believe the money will be returned on a percentage basis to the donors. But other donors say there have been informal conversations among Right to Rise officials about using that money to go after Trump.
Still think the GOP is not in deep doo-doo – better think again. Those big donors are worried sick – and rightly so. Even Jar-Jar Binks thinks so - just ask him:

Thanks for stopping by pray for the GOP's survival (big smile - no, not really).

No comments: